Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
The LHAC schedules are the same teams same place in the schedule, but the home/ homes have flipped. For instance last year FH opened with Westy @ Trojan Stadium. This year, it's Westy again for game #1, but in Sidman.
It ain't over until it's over.
- billmurray
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 915
- Joined: December 2nd, 2012, 9:43 am
- Location: Centre Hall
- Contact:
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
All schedules are up: http://www.westernpafootball.net/db/schedules/index.php5Manfred wrote:The LHAC schedules are the same teams same place in the schedule, but the home/ homes have flipped. For instance last year FH opened with Westy @ Trojan Stadium. This year, it's Westy again for game #1, but in Sidman.
- DragonsDoExist
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: September 10th, 2012, 1:49 pm
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Will learn a lot about this years Dragon squad real early. Open at Hollidaysburg then get to break in the new turf at Tyrone week 2 followed by a visit from Clearfield week 3.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You play to win the game!!!
-
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: August 25th, 2014, 12:12 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
I was told that the majority of their line graduated and they didn't have much size up front this year. Based on maxpreps this looked to be the case as wellCrimson's Ghost wrote:Yeah AA should be interesting in general.
Westmont has 2 of their 3 top rushers back with a big line again. They'll do what they do, ball control.
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 11116
- Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Based off of last year's roster, the five biggest linemen they return are listed at ....
6'3" 300
6'3" 260
5'6" 250
5'9" 230
6'1" 210
That's pretty big for a AA team, they won't all be 6'3" 260 like last year, but they still have some size up front.
6'3" 300
6'3" 260
5'6" 250
5'9" 230
6'1" 210
That's pretty big for a AA team, they won't all be 6'3" 260 like last year, but they still have some size up front.
- TAHS92Alum
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 950
- Joined: February 5th, 2014, 9:34 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Dragon the field is looking real good, will be interesting to see if the sod holds up that night. That will be the first action on it, but its for sure the nicest grass this side of Beaver Stadium currentlyWill learn a lot about this years Dragon squad real early. Open at Hollidaysburg then get to break in the new turf at Tyrone week 2 followed by a visit from Clearfield week 3.
-BIRDS OF PREY-
- DragonsDoExist
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: September 10th, 2012, 1:49 pm
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Yes. Saw a couple pics on twitter. Looks great!TAHS92Alum wrote:Dragon the field is looking real good, will be interesting to see if the sod holds up that night. That will be the first action on it, but its for sure the nicest grass this side of Beaver Stadium currentlyWill learn a lot about this years Dragon squad real early. Open at Hollidaysburg then get to break in the new turf at Tyrone week 2 followed by a visit from Clearfield week 3.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You play to win the game!!!
-
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: August 25th, 2014, 12:12 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
I guess on paper it doesn't look bad. This person seemed to think their line was going to be a weak spot this year. There is a difference between an athletic/strong 6'3" 260 and an out of shape 6'3" 260, so maybe that's the difference?Crimson's Ghost wrote:Based off of last year's roster, the five biggest linemen they return are listed at ....
6'3" 300
6'3" 260
5'6" 250
5'9" 230
6'1" 210
That's pretty big for a AA team, they won't all be 6'3" 260 like last year, but they still have some size up front.
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 11116
- Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Could be, I didn't think their line was overly athletic beyond Bulas last year. They were big and imposing.
I still think with Moors and Kushner, they'll be able to run the ball. The Moors kid is a really good athlete. So it may not be 3 yards and a cloud of dust each play, I think he'll find more running lanes and be able to cut to the outside this year. The look may be a little different, but I think the results can be similar.
I still think with Moors and Kushner, they'll be able to run the ball. The Moors kid is a really good athlete. So it may not be 3 yards and a cloud of dust each play, I think he'll find more running lanes and be able to cut to the outside this year. The look may be a little different, but I think the results can be similar.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Big but young (3 sophomores) Westmont lost a lot from last years class. I think it will be a pretty competitive conference this year. BG with Sankey in the backfield and the giant oline in front will probably go undefeated again. I give PC 2 years before they make a playoff push very little seniors. Dark horse is CC, nice sized line (265avg) that has experience if they can hold up like the previous poster said they got the athletes.
Also if anyone is bored tomorrow 7on7 at Mansion Park. Tyrone, Altoona, Clearfield and other local teams will be there.
Also if anyone is bored tomorrow 7on7 at Mansion Park. Tyrone, Altoona, Clearfield and other local teams will be there.