Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Probably not going to be able to give up 50 and win many games.bigrig15 wrote:Saw CC play 7 on 7 and they looked really good. If they can block I think they will be able to compete cause they have tons of skill.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
CC gave up 55 in game 1 i think?? QB is pretty good and have a couple WR. But, not playing D and throwing the ball 40 times a game doesn't typically add up to a successful season.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Everybody is sleeping on Huntingdon. Their running back is a freak
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 11115
- Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Expecting 6-4. Any more will be gravy.Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
It ain't over until it's over.
- DragonsDoExist
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: September 10th, 2012, 1:49 pm
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
I don't think anyone is "sleeping" on Huntingdon. They've been one of the favorites for this year since last season ended.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You play to win the game!!!
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
??? BG and Johnstown. Who else are you expecting them to lose to?Manfred wrote:Expecting 6-4. Any more will be gravy.Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
-
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: September 14th, 2004, 3:56 pm
- Location: Bedford
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year. I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had. Am I wrong on that? Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 11115
- Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Section I of the LHAC shouldn't present a lot of challenges to Forest Hills outside of BG. BC, PC, and CC are locks for wins.
Forest Hills should be 7-3 or better.
Forest Hills should be 7-3 or better.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
The 2nd string Qb, Evan Kundrod, is also a starting receiver, and has played well as a Sr. Another 2 receivers, Forrest Wolfhope and Seth Richardson, have stepped up as well. The young linemen have played pretty well, gotten a bit more size than last year. Shawn Sikora has returned as a Sr. tailback/ LB and is an accomplished powerlifter. You forgot Elgin as a RB/ LB.Lefteyelouie wrote:I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year. I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had. Am I wrong on that? Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?
It ain't over until it's over.