Which is More Damaging for McCort?
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
Chicowilliams said it was a tie. And speaking of a tie, isn't that what Billy Bruce and Steve Gates wore to school everyday AFTER Ken "the fence" Salem admitted them to BM as students even though KS knew they were transferring for athletic reasons which is against the rules of the PIAA???????
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
Well, the posters don't help the rumors...
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
if they win states it was a good idea to move down...If they get killed by steelton maybe they should of waited a cycle. Whats 2 more years in AA gonna hurt everyone knows the talent is still there and coming in (Ruggs and Merrimen).
- Eaglealum
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 3993
- Joined: August 24th, 2003, 7:20 pm
- Location: Tyrone,PA
- Contact:
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
my bad OG, I did misread that a bit; And agree with you.
"Don't argue with stupid people; they'll drop you to their level and beat you with experience."
.... A. Einstein
.... A. Einstein
-
BMFootball
- Freshman

- Posts: 26
- Joined: November 29th, 2007, 10:35 am
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
red4life wrote:Ummmmm, who cares?
The real question is how many times must the recruiters of MCort suck the **** of the recruits to make them go to McCort.
Real classy comment...way to act like a role model to all the high school kids who view this site...
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
BMFootball wrote:red4life wrote:Ummmmm, who cares?
The real question is how many times must the recruiters of MCort suck the **** of the recruits to make them go to McCort.
Real classy comment...way to act like a role model to all the high school kids who view this site...
Real classy huh? Was it real classy for you guys to move down to Class A even though you're downright good enough to play in Class AA?
Yeah, you don't know what's classy anymore than I do.
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
Good/valid points Op & BM will remain very good/experienced next yr.....it's following '09 the decline will, in fact, begin (paralleling a leveling of mid A size like #'s) ! And I am also on record of having favored remaining 'up' to AA for @ least one more yr...not so much as to be 'title defending' but an AA playoff/final four this yr w/ Tyrone, CC, FH & BM would have been awesome! Of course, I firmly feel Crushers would have prevailed...they are getting healthier and won @ CC while dinged up (w/out Seidel, Domonkos-1st qtr injury & a qb on one leg) where the rangers whimpered...remember the History lesson Op:Opinionguy wrote:Neither...what all you whiners fail to realize is there is no substitute for success. Winning overcomes all other nonsense.
McCort's overall dominance will come to an end just as FH's, Tyrone's, and BC's did. .
Opinionguy wrote:The OG is a firm believer in history. .
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
As most BC poster know from Counseling 101...1st step in dealing w/ a problem is admission thereof....red4 taking 1st step!red4life wrote:Yeah, you don't know what's classy anymore than I do.
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
I too would have enjoyed BM staying at "AA". While I don't feel there is anything wrong with moving down, I would have loved playing Tryone, FH, or CC again. The nonsense of "BM defending their title", they won back to back, is not very valid seeing they defended their original title.
As for the "drop off" idea, I don't see that happening. They still have good players comming through, what will be lacking will be depth, something Salem still doesn't understand anything about.
As for the "drop off" idea, I don't see that happening. They still have good players comming through, what will be lacking will be depth, something Salem still doesn't understand anything about.
Re: Which is More Damaging for McCort?
BM would have been defending their title for another 15+ years, they are that good
