Pitts Cupcake Schedule

[El-Moldo]

No bias. Facts. If Sagarin is good enough for USAToday, it should be good enough for all of us. Try another theory. And 44th strength of schedule is quite respectable.

[KirkHerbstreit]

The highest ranked team team Pitt will face based off the sagarin ratings is 30th. In other words, 29 other teams would be favored in every game to go undefeated with their schedule. Quite respectable!!!

[El-Moldo]

But it's NOT one team. It's an aggregate of ALL teams that determines your strength of schedule. What you're saying is, playing ONE team in the top 10 and 8 teams above hundred is better???? 44 out of 245 is great. Only 43 have a tougher schedule.

[KirkHerbstreit]

245 teams of which 70 you can probably actually name. You have zero decent teams in your conference. You have played zero good teams Out of Conference. You can rely on Sagarins computer. I'll rely on common sense.

[bleacherbum]

Lets have this same discussion in a week or so after tip off..

[KirkHerbstreit]

Penn State fans aren't stupid enough to argue about basketball when they know Pitt is the better program in perfomance, attendance, etc.

[El-Moldo]

After the bowl season is over, we'll see how good Pitt's conference teams compare to other teams. And Pitt's occ schedule, with Iowa, Utah, and ND is quite respectable. And I'm sure YOU know more than Sagarin about college football teams, their rankings and strength's of schedule.

[KirkHerbstreit]

Newsflash....It NEEDS to be respectable because your conference schedule never is. However, this year the teams on your OCC are average teams.

[El-Moldo]

PLEASE end this!!! For the 100th time, Pitt's strength of schedule is 44th out of 245. You can say anything you want. You are entitled to your opinion. BUT there are only 43 college football teams with tougher schedules. What else do you want me to say? Keep harping, but I'll keep using the same defense.

[KirkHerbstreit]

245 teams really makes your argument look outstanding. Can you name the teams without copy and paste?