Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
- JungleJuice2
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 202
- Joined: September 25th, 2004, 2:07 pm
- Location: Bedford
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Bedfordtransplant: But you said "some" unconventional calls on Bedford helped "ameliorate" the turnovers by FH. Do you mean that the 5 yard penalty on Bedford for the illegal signalling of a fair catch helped EVEN OUT the turnovers committed by FH?
-
11th man
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 390
- Joined: August 25th, 2003, 12:00 pm
- Location: The Pennsylvania State University
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Yeah, my misunderstanding there. Now there were definitely some unconventional calls in Sidman during that game in 03
"On the boats and on the planes" - Neil Diamond
I'm Deon's Butler
I'm Deon's Butler
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Here's what I can't understand. Bedford was the better team last night. NO doubt about it. But you have some guy come on here and say that there were "some" unconventional calls against Bedford that were on par to being equal to the turnovers FH gaves up. Really? And then he mentions a 5 yard penalty which meant NOTHING to the outcome of the game. NOTHING!!! This kind of stuff is hard to take.
-
bedfordtransplant
- Freshman

- Posts: 24
- Joined: September 17th, 2005, 3:40 am
Sorry to not fully satisfy your question, Moldo. No, I didn't mean that the calls were either on par, or equal, to the turnovers - just that they lessened the impact to some degree. There were at least 2 big gains called back on penalties, which were possibly/probably correct calls. However, those penalties kept the game close at the time. I shouldn't have used the term "unconventional" in regard to these calls.
I'll grant the 5 yard penalty had NOTHING to do with the outcome of the game, yet it still seems an odd call when the kid was clearly waving for fair catch. It was a 20 yard difference in field position.
The gist of my comments was that Bedford improved greatly. And I still stand by that.
I'll grant the 5 yard penalty had NOTHING to do with the outcome of the game, yet it still seems an odd call when the kid was clearly waving for fair catch. It was a 20 yard difference in field position.
The gist of my comments was that Bedford improved greatly. And I still stand by that.
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Gonna have to make yourself clear on here. alot of posters on here take things literally. And NO big words like ameliorate either.
-
Pale Rider
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 885
- Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Webster's Dictionary- ameliorate: To make better; to improve.
Maybe after FH extricates their cranial containers from their rectal orifices, they can still "ameliorate" the rest of their season.
Maybe after FH extricates their cranial containers from their rectal orifices, they can still "ameliorate" the rest of their season.
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE
- JungleJuice2
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 202
- Joined: September 25th, 2004, 2:07 pm
- Location: Bedford
Re: Bedford leading Forest Hills 21-0, 2nd half
Little off subject but, is Ron Walters helping out at Bedford? I had heard that he was but figured id ask some bedford people to confirm. And if he is..whats he doing?
