BleacherCoaches.com

When you say things more than likely doesnt seem like facts but assumptions.

Again this topic is he knew in 1976. Yet 0 has been proved. You may want to call it civil but sounds criminal to me

konjo78 wrote:Im not wrong. Again the facts you guys portray usually end up wrong or missing 99% of an actual story

Once again it's either you're right or nobody is

Its not im right. Facts are right. Those chosing to not read up and ignore them are fighting against facts.

Their whole argument now is based on a claim that has not even been proven or brought to court yet. If its followed through and hold then it becomes fact and changes things.

If not then we have a bunch of people here who will once again look stupid when it comes to this issue.

and if they're right?

Then they are right and we will look back at this situation and judge based on context.

But let the process work through before jumping in a media crusade based on a claim that hasnt been followee through yet. Thats what happened originally and few years later, ncaa, media fell flat on their face.

Crimson's Ghost wrote:Haha thanks bud, but shouldn't you be negatively rating my posts?  The feature is working again FYI.

You know what the best thing is...he created the account UpVoteMachine just to keep his number up so he can give the negative vote to people 

Yes I did see those accounts shared an IP address. 

You know those reports for flagging posts go directly to me?

What were the reports? Are you not doing your job crimson? Pretty sure reports claim are 100% correct on certain comments being off topic

I always have to chuckle at these discussions. Some people love a university and a man so much, one which they probably didn't attend, they refuse to see any other side or hear any other opinion. It's a piece of information, true or not, that was put out there to get attention, for better or worse. Don't feed into the media hype