BleacherCoaches.com

Or if you can keep him out of the parking lot.

Dokkenball wrote:Sarcasm aside, Westmont should go after a head coach or coordinator that does not work for the district.

Who I would pursue, in no particular order.

Joe Arcurio (Head Coach at Ferndale)
Tony Penna (Offensive Coordinator at Johnstown)
Kevin Sheridan (Asst at McCort) will never happen without a teaching job to go along with it.
Dave Seidel (Defensive Coordinator at McCort)
Neal Coolbaugh (Defensive Coordinator at Johnstown)
Greg Gardill (Asst at McCort)
Jeremy Burkett (Asst at Portage)

Darkhorse Pick: Ralph DeMarco (Asst at Windber) If a principal position opens up.

On considering Arcurio's record...I don't think Don Shula could win any more games than he did with the amount of talent at Ferndale

Yeah I think he did himself a favor by stepping into the no win situation they have at Ferndale for reasons like this. Experience is something that is very valuable and although he only has one year of head coaching experience at the HS level, thats still one more year than many of the Westmont parents who think they should have the job. I think Arcurio could do a great job with this team because he does know football very well. Also I believe that Dave Seidel would rather be shot in the face than be the head coach at Westmont. Gardill would also not be in the mix. He is one man that doesn't put up with crap about playing time or anything for that matter. So I would write him off now. Burkett is an interesting candidate. He has the credentials to be a head coach and I know he was a coach that his players liked. Kevin Sheridan would be a great head coach. Does anyone out there think that he would leave McCort to take this position? I know the man bleeds crimson and gold but the green would definitely be nicer at Westmont. Ask Tim Reagan about Richland.

I wouldn't count on Kevin Sheridan as an even possible candidate for the job. The man is strictly only McCort

I Know Everything wrote:Dokkenball,

Get you head out of ur ****. Obviously ur from westmont and is very involved becuase u obviously attend all the booster meetings, football games and other axctivites since u know that all the guys u named have the answers to westmonts coaching problem. Wll the answer is simple, Darren is a loser and will always be a loser. He never was anything at all. He does not know football whatsoever. He is predictable and dumb.

And for The Graduate,

i bet u and mclauren make out, Mcaluren sucked as a football coach, he just freakin blows at head coaching and coaching in general, u wanna bash some parents for driving out a loser, some kids have a future playing college football, mclauren does **** for the kids and only cares about himself, if he would look in the mirror and realie his mistakes then he would be a better person, let alone football coach. He is selfish and as i said before sucks at football coaching.

Get the hell out of here, you illiterate bigot. If you worried less about football, which you're obviously going nowhere in, and more about studying, you would know that it is a PERIOD, not a comma, that ends a sentence.

Looks like we have one of the disgruntled players on the thread now. Probably the player of the disgruntled dad. You obviously know nothing about football. You are an egotistical self cenetered person that is extremely ignorant for what you just posted. Get your mind out of the gutter and learn the facts because you my friend know absolutely nothing about anything.


My vote is for anyone who doesnt have any ties with westmont.

Crimson Returns wrote: Get the hell out of here, you illiterate bigot. If you worried less about football, which you're obviously going nowhere in, and more about studying, you would know that it is a PERIOD, not a comma, that ends a sentence.

Yes, but his grammar skills may improve by staying!

vman wrote: Yes, but his grammar skills may improve by staying!

As will his irrelevant anti-homosexual statements, yes?

Why must you always start a post by quoting someone. Can't you speak your ideas clearly without concrete evidence to support your thoughts or something? Do you not know enough on the subject to speak for yourself?

I know very little about the topic at hand, therefore I post very little. You may want to consider doing the same.

walker texas ranger wrote:Why must you always start a post by quoting someone. Can't you speak your ideas clearly without concrete evidence to support your thoughts or something? Do you not know enough on the subject to speak for yourself?

I know very little about the topic at hand, therefore I post very little. You may want to consider doing the same.

I do this so people do not become confused as to whom I am replying to. For instance here, I am replying to a dumbass who is insinuating I am not familiar with the topic at hand. Yet strangely enough... I was the one who started the topic. Interesting, yes? And by the way, great logic saying that I can't speak for myself, even though I clearly am speaking for myself when I respond to other poster's comments. Strike one, moron. :roll: