2009 Sideling Hill League

Ladies of the Diamond
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

update below
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

update below
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

update below
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

update below
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

Friday's partial update below....
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

update through Fri 5/8

Thanks to info from hardball...given below

update through Saturday, below
hardball21
Junior
Junior
Posts: 118
Joined: March 26th, 2006, 10:07 am

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by hardball21 »

F-M lost both games today.
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by Sneakers »

Update later...

My unofficial take on ICC south ....

MCCon is 8-2 DH Mon with Eve and with SF (I think) to finish ICC schedule, if McC splits who goes?
FM is 9-3
Eve is 6-3, game Mon Mcc but games Fri 5/15 TM and Sat 5/16 SF too late for championship against CK
SF is 6-3 game Mon Mc but games Thurs NB and Sat Eve too late to factor in Tues Championship against CK
hardball21
Junior
Junior
Posts: 118
Joined: March 26th, 2006, 10:07 am

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by hardball21 »

It appears that F-M and McBg moved all their games up so they would be completed in time for the ICC Championship Game, but Everett and SF did not do the same. MY take would be that if McBG wins on monday they should represent the ICC South. If they lose on monday and are tied with F-M, the represenative should come from F-M or McBg via whatever the criteria is for the tiebreaker. SF and Eve should be out based on the fact they games remaining and could have made the same attempt to play on open dates as McBg and F-M did.
softballfan
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 61
Joined: January 29th, 2006, 2:39 pm

Re: 2009 Sideling Hill League

Post by softballfan »

What is the criteria for a tie breaker should McCbrg & FM end up with the same record in ICC?
Who is the other team they will play? Is that known yet?

Is the ICC game worth playing 2 tough teams in the same day?
McCbrg does play Everett & SF in the same day and they don't have the luxury of multiple pitchers. Or should the focus be on maintaining district standing by playing as many games fresh as possible?
Post Reply