Page 3 of 5
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 28th, 2017, 6:50 pm
by youngbuck
bigrig15 wrote:Saw CC play 7 on 7 and they looked really good. If they can block I think they will be able to compete cause they have tons of skill.
Probably not going to be able to give up 50 and win many games.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 8:47 am
by silentbob
CC gave up 55 in game 1 i think?? QB is pretty good and have a couple WR. But, not playing D and throwing the ball 40 times a game doesn't typically add up to a successful season.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 8:59 am
by SwaggyJ23
Everybody is sleeping on Huntingdon. Their running back is a freak
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 10:03 am
by Crimson's Ghost
Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 12:12 pm
by Manfred
Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
Expecting 6-4. Any more will be gravy.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 2:25 pm
by DragonsDoExist
I don't think anyone is "sleeping" on Huntingdon. They've been one of the favorites for this year since last season ended.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 2:42 pm
by youngbuck
Manfred wrote:Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.
Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it.
Expecting 6-4. Any more will be gravy.
??? BG and Johnstown. Who else are you expecting them to lose to?
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 2:48 pm
by Lefteyelouie
I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year. I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had. Am I wrong on that? Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 2:51 pm
by Crimson's Ghost
Section I of the LHAC shouldn't present a lot of challenges to Forest Hills outside of BG. BC, PC, and CC are locks for wins.
Forest Hills should be 7-3 or better.
Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings
Posted: August 29th, 2017, 5:36 pm
by Manfred
Lefteyelouie wrote:I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year. I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had. Am I wrong on that? Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?
The 2nd string Qb, Evan Kundrod, is also a starting receiver, and has played well as a Sr. Another 2 receivers, Forrest Wolfhope and Seth Richardson, have stepped up as well. The young linemen have played pretty well, gotten a bit more size than last year. Shawn Sikora has returned as a Sr. tailback/ LB and is an accomplished powerlifter. You forgot Elgin as a RB/ LB.