Global Warming? Debunked finally!

[southpaw]

How is it apples and oranges?

People come out and say this is bad for the environment.
People come out and say smoking is bad for people.

Businesses will have to pay more money due to new regulations, so they claim it is false.
Tobacco companies will lose a lot of money when people find out smoking causes cancer, so they hire their own scientists to claim that it is false.

Businesses say screw the environment. We don't want to pay more money. Who cares about the future?
Tobacco companies say screw the people that smoke. We don't care if they die. They will always have children that will smoke unless they die before they have children.

They both could care less about the future. I guess you're in the same boat? It's good you have some tough hide.

Who sounds drunk now? More name calling and condescension. You really need to get a grip on reality.

Just because Al Gore and his bogus junk science says this and that are bad for the environment are we to be lemmings and blindly follow him over the cliff. Not me I don't drink the Obama-ade or the Gore-rlsh (not the beer!). Show me some proof and I haven't seen any!

[deliverance]

It's all fake. Al Gore made it up to make money. Typical Republican thinking.

[vman]

When you get a Phanerozic Carbon Dioxide Graph shoved in your grill indicating that current atmospheric carbon levels are about 350-400 ppmv. it's advisable one just shut up & move on...bringing up Al Gore in effort to counteract that is like the proverbial knife in a gun fight!!

[southpaw]

vman I'm cracking up. lol. Bringing a knife to a Pershing missile fight more like it!

[deliverance]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... rming.html

[count2infinity]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... rming.html

no no no... those liberal nut jobs are just pushing their political agenda! wise up deliverance.

[deliverance]

I know. My bad.

[southpaw]

Did you read the article deliverance? Or just cutting and pasting? The IPCC is a bunch of scientists who are interested in one thing. Getting more grant money to conduct more junk science research. No mention of the MWP followed by the "Little Ice Age". The MWP (Medieval Warm Period) had temps warmer than we currently have today! How about that! Greenland was green 1000 years ago. The vikings flourished their until the LIA started about 350 years later. They grazed sheep and cattle in the lush pastoral climate of Greenland of all places! Don't buy into the hype! Planetary temp. can also be tied to sun spot activity called the maunder minimum.

There are way way too many factors in play that we don't fully understand to make a blanket assessment by the IPCC that man is the main cause of the current warming phase. For example... Remember the LIA ended about 1850 and we entered a warming phase. So sure records are going to show increasing temps. over the last 400 years. We were in the middle of the LIA 400 years ago! Point of fact the IPCC is an agent of the UN and the UN is hell bent on pursuing this agenda to one end a NWO and the end of our constitution. That's it believe what you want but all of my research points only to this conclusion.

[southpaw]

BTW I read that Europe is backing off the accords of the Kyoto treaty. China was never going to go along with it anyway. Now watch the "new change we can believe in" admin. will accept it!

[southpaw]

Climategate: Finally! Will the truth finally be told? What does this do Al Gore plans to rule the World? What did Barry know and when did he know it? What does this do with to Cap and Trade?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm? ... 6&Issue_id

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/james ... al-warming

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200 ... l-cooling/

The whole Al Gore crusade on man made global warming is based on junk science and bogus data. My problem count is using this bogus junk science to promote a radical political agenda under the guise of "saving" civilization. Will cutting carbon emissions really stop this so called man-made global warming? Here is a graph of carbon emissions throughout geologic history.
I can cherry pick to prove my point too.



Current atmospheric carbon levels are about 350-400 ppmv.