West-Pac
-
konjo78
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 4561
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
- Location: tri cities, Washington
Re: West-Pac
What makes the ICC so good? Bellwood? That's about it. They've had no success outside of Bellwood. Mo valley just got handled by an OK blairsville team
Re: West-Pac
well the LHAC is primarily AA teams so......yea no crap Berlin wouldn't have as many wins. Good thinking John MaddenTheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Whoever wins this arguement can officially say they are the 2nd worst conference in the area. Congratualations. If Berlin were in the LHAC they would have 3 wins maybe not even that. Portage could hold their own with a couple teams. I give them 5 wins tops. As for the other teams I think they would have to ask ferndale what they do in November. As for the heritage, put HC in the ICC they would have been no where close to the record they have. Bottom line being, Both conferences are bad. If we didn't have them these teams wouldn't see to many wins and probably never see the playoffs.
If only closed minds came with closed mouths
- GreenMachine
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 478
- Joined: October 14th, 2010, 7:15 pm
- Location: Portage, PA
Re: West-Pac
And I agree with Konjo for a change, the ICC isn't this power conference either besides Bellwood. They have some nice teams like the Heritage and WestPac but nothing spectacular.
-
TheRealBleacherCoach
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 350
- Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm
Re: West-Pac
Bellwood? Mount Union? NBC? Tussey? That's what makes them better than the heritage. And Everett is another team who isnt having a great season but could still beat most of the heritage. Berlin is largely overrated. So is HC. Berlin doesn't have a chance against any WPIAL team. HC doesn't have a chance in districts. These two conferences are fun to watch in the regular season as long as they stay within each other. Outside of the conferences they won't do anything in my opinion. And yes I agree I'm not saying the ICC is a power conference by any means. I just think the caliber of play is better than the heritage. This is just my opinion! Not looking to start a riot! Lol
-
konjo78
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 4561
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
- Location: tri cities, Washington
Re: West-Pac
Mount union is no different from ligonier... Tussey is having their best season but still haven't gotten d5 crown from westpac schools. And NBC hasn't won much in D5 playoffs. Beside Bellwood i wouldn't expect much from ICC
-
TheRealBleacherCoach
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 350
- Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm
Re: West-Pac
Bishop Carrol and Bishop Giulfoyle are single A. And don't start with the recruitment non sense because they are usually near the bottom of the pack. These teams are both single A and are very competitive with AA schools.12HankQB wrote:well the LHAC is primarily AA teams so......yea no crap Berlin wouldn't have as many wins. Good thinking John MaddenTheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Whoever wins this arguement can officially say they are the 2nd worst conference in the area. Congratualations. If Berlin were in the LHAC they would have 3 wins maybe not even that. Portage could hold their own with a couple teams. I give them 5 wins tops. As for the other teams I think they would have to ask ferndale what they do in November. As for the heritage, put HC in the ICC they would have been no where close to the record they have. Bottom line being, Both conferences are bad. If we didn't have them these teams wouldn't see to many wins and probably never see the playoffs.
-
Ramblerman24
- Sophomore

- Posts: 66
- Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm
Re: West-Pac
TheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Bellwood? Mount Union? NBC? Tussey? That's what makes them better than the heritage. And Everett is another team who isnt having a great season but could still beat most of the heritage. Berlin is largely overrated. So is HC. Berlin doesn't have a chance against any WPIAL team. HC doesn't have a chance in districts. These two conferences are fun to watch in the regular season as long as they stay within each other. Outside of the conferences they won't do anything in my opinion. And yes I agree I'm not saying the ICC is a power conference by any means. I just think the caliber of play is better than the heritage. This is just my opinion! Not looking to start a riot! Lol
Please ask a NBC and Tussey fan how they did in the playoffs against the West Pac teams in recent years
-
Ramblerman24
- Sophomore

- Posts: 66
- Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm
Re: West-Pac
All I am saying is, that the so called weakest conference in the area has two number one spots in single A.
For the argument that Berlin would not have five wins in the LH Conference no LH team would have five wins in the WPIAL
For the argument that Berlin would not have five wins in the LH Conference no LH team would have five wins in the WPIAL
-
TheRealBleacherCoach
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 350
- Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm
Re: West-Pac
Ramblin: Um Richland wouldn't have five wins in the WPIAL? I believe they would. and they have the number one spots because they have a good west pac record? Doesn't mean they are the best.
-
Ramblerman24
- Sophomore

- Posts: 66
- Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm
Re: West-Pac
They might this year as Portage and Berlin would probably have 5 wins in the LH this year. The best team in any conference might have 5 wins in any other conference that is similar in size.