West-Pac

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4561
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: West-Pac

Post by konjo78 »

What makes the ICC so good? Bellwood? That's about it. They've had no success outside of Bellwood. Mo valley just got handled by an OK blairsville team
User avatar
12HankQB
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2817
Joined: August 29th, 2009, 4:32 pm
Location: Mile 129

Re: West-Pac

Post by 12HankQB »

TheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Whoever wins this arguement can officially say they are the 2nd worst conference in the area. Congratualations. If Berlin were in the LHAC they would have 3 wins maybe not even that. Portage could hold their own with a couple teams. I give them 5 wins tops. As for the other teams I think they would have to ask ferndale what they do in November. As for the heritage, put HC in the ICC they would have been no where close to the record they have. Bottom line being, Both conferences are bad. If we didn't have them these teams wouldn't see to many wins and probably never see the playoffs.
well the LHAC is primarily AA teams so......yea no crap Berlin wouldn't have as many wins. Good thinking John Madden
If only closed minds came with closed mouths
User avatar
GreenMachine
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 478
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 7:15 pm
Location: Portage, PA

Re: West-Pac

Post by GreenMachine »

And I agree with Konjo for a change, the ICC isn't this power conference either besides Bellwood. They have some nice teams like the Heritage and WestPac but nothing spectacular.
TheRealBleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 350
Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by TheRealBleacherCoach »

Bellwood? Mount Union? NBC? Tussey? That's what makes them better than the heritage. And Everett is another team who isnt having a great season but could still beat most of the heritage. Berlin is largely overrated. So is HC. Berlin doesn't have a chance against any WPIAL team. HC doesn't have a chance in districts. These two conferences are fun to watch in the regular season as long as they stay within each other. Outside of the conferences they won't do anything in my opinion. And yes I agree I'm not saying the ICC is a power conference by any means. I just think the caliber of play is better than the heritage. This is just my opinion! Not looking to start a riot! Lol
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4561
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: West-Pac

Post by konjo78 »

Mount union is no different from ligonier... Tussey is having their best season but still haven't gotten d5 crown from westpac schools. And NBC hasn't won much in D5 playoffs. Beside Bellwood i wouldn't expect much from ICC
TheRealBleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 350
Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by TheRealBleacherCoach »

12HankQB wrote:
TheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Whoever wins this arguement can officially say they are the 2nd worst conference in the area. Congratualations. If Berlin were in the LHAC they would have 3 wins maybe not even that. Portage could hold their own with a couple teams. I give them 5 wins tops. As for the other teams I think they would have to ask ferndale what they do in November. As for the heritage, put HC in the ICC they would have been no where close to the record they have. Bottom line being, Both conferences are bad. If we didn't have them these teams wouldn't see to many wins and probably never see the playoffs.
well the LHAC is primarily AA teams so......yea no crap Berlin wouldn't have as many wins. Good thinking John Madden
Bishop Carrol and Bishop Giulfoyle are single A. And don't start with the recruitment non sense because they are usually near the bottom of the pack. These teams are both single A and are very competitive with AA schools.
Ramblerman24
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 66
Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by Ramblerman24 »

TheRealBleacherCoach wrote:Bellwood? Mount Union? NBC? Tussey? That's what makes them better than the heritage. And Everett is another team who isnt having a great season but could still beat most of the heritage. Berlin is largely overrated. So is HC. Berlin doesn't have a chance against any WPIAL team. HC doesn't have a chance in districts. These two conferences are fun to watch in the regular season as long as they stay within each other. Outside of the conferences they won't do anything in my opinion. And yes I agree I'm not saying the ICC is a power conference by any means. I just think the caliber of play is better than the heritage. This is just my opinion! Not looking to start a riot! Lol

Please ask a NBC and Tussey fan how they did in the playoffs against the West Pac teams in recent years
Ramblerman24
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 66
Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by Ramblerman24 »

All I am saying is, that the so called weakest conference in the area has two number one spots in single A.

For the argument that Berlin would not have five wins in the LH Conference no LH team would have five wins in the WPIAL
TheRealBleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 350
Joined: October 12th, 2013, 3:38 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by TheRealBleacherCoach »

Ramblin: Um Richland wouldn't have five wins in the WPIAL? I believe they would. and they have the number one spots because they have a good west pac record? Doesn't mean they are the best.
Ramblerman24
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 66
Joined: October 11th, 2012, 3:04 pm

Re: West-Pac

Post by Ramblerman24 »

They might this year as Portage and Berlin would probably have 5 wins in the LH this year. The best team in any conference might have 5 wins in any other conference that is similar in size.
Post Reply