Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
Post Reply
TheKid
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 8
Joined: February 10th, 2009, 1:19 pm

Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by TheKid »

Hmmm should Mccort have an asterik(sp?) next to anything they've ever accomplished?? you tell me...
User avatar
nLions1
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1091
Joined: September 30th, 2008, 1:20 pm
Location: The good side of the hill seperating BC and CC

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by nLions1 »

No, you tell me.
Well let me tell you, nLions1 is a big time friend of Janek!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"That's the difference between Pitt and PSU fans. We Pitt fans know that we stink and can readily admit it." - WPIAL~Titan
hornets69
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 372
Joined: November 23rd, 2008, 12:16 am

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by hornets69 »

yes. any private school or school in a co-op agreement should have one by their name and accomplishment.
Travo01
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 57
Joined: January 14th, 2007, 10:16 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by Travo01 »

2006 *LHAC Champs* *District VI AA Champs*
2007 *LHAC Champs* *District VI AA Champs*
2008 *LHAC Champs* *District VI A Champs*
2009 *??* *??*

**** Looks Good To me.. I'm for it!!****
pittisit85
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 68
Joined: February 26th, 2009, 2:04 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by pittisit85 »

you can put an asterisk by the district titles but conference titles has nothing to with classifications making it fair game. why don't the haters just step up and beat these men and take back the conference title. only 2009 will tell gentleman
Penn State fans have fun in the NIT
lakersfan24
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 869
Joined: February 10th, 2008, 9:33 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by lakersfan24 »

No. It's not like they are like Bonds deliberately cheating. The PIAA allows how they do business to happen, so until the PIAA makes a rule against this how can you say they are cheating? If the MLB decided for some teams steroids were allowed Bonds would be good to go..
pats39
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 824
Joined: February 4th, 2008, 10:19 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by pats39 »

I hardly think speaking out against an unfairness is "hating" , and anyone that does not see this injustice is naive.
Dfense wins games
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1401
Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by Dfense wins games »

Correct, but when every topic turns into it and names are dragged down with lies (slander), I'd consider that "hating".
lakersfan24
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 869
Joined: February 10th, 2008, 9:33 pm

Re: Should the crushers have an asterik?? (sp?)

Post by lakersfan24 »

I agree DWG, Everyone knows I'm not McCort fan but it's getting real old, and bringing kids down with the ship is real mature too...
Post Reply